Skip to main content

Detailed analysis of ANCP experimental motor

A 2" ANCP experimental PVC motor was fabricated according to the posts here: 

The following physical parameters describe the motor:
  • Casting Tube outer diameter:  1.55 inch
  • Bore diameter:  .75 inch
  • Grain length 3.875 inch
  • Number of Grains: 4
  • Nozzle Throat:  0.375 inch

The propellant has been previously characterized with the following parameters:
  • a = 0.0048 in / sec
  • n = 0.543 
  • C* = 4565 ft/s
  • Density = 0.0527 lb / in^3

Based on the composition of the propellant the following predictions were made:

  • Max Pressure:  352 PSI
  • Burn Time 3.75 s
  • Average Thrust 35.5 lb
  • Propellant Weight 1.18 lb


Predicted Pressure vs Time curve

Predicted Thrust vs Time curve


After burning the motor, the following data was obtained: 

Pressure(psi) vs. Time(s) curve obtained from the pressure transducer
Thrust(lbs) vs Time(s) obtained from S type Load Cell


 Unfortunately, there is no access to the theoretical raw curve data, so only the following comparisons can be made:

  • Max pressure Theoretical:  352 PSI
  • Max Pressure measured:  353 PSI  +- 3 PSI
  • Max Thrust Theoretical:  41.44 lb
  • Max Thrust Measured:  43.9 lb +- 3 lb

Measured values agree with predictions within uncertainty, which lead a good level of confidence in the characterization of the propellant. 

The empirical value for C* can be calculated from the pressure vs time graph as follows:

C* = (Area of pressure vs time) * Area of throat (in^2) * 32.2 (ft/s^2)  / Weight of propellant (lbs)

Integrating the experimental pressure time graph gives 1343 psi . s.  Given that the weight of the propellant was 1.18 lbs:

C* = 1343 * .11 in^2 * 32.2 / 1.18 = 4031 ft/s  

There is large uncertainty in this value since the grains were NOT weighed before final assembly.  

Given a mass uncertainty of 1.18lbs + .1 - .2 gives range of C* values from 3715 to 4853 ft/sec

While this value is consistent with the theoretical value for C*, it is not consistent with our value for the delivered C* based on the exit cone efficiency.  This is not surprising since the exit cone was initially drilled straight and machined itself into an ideal parabola during the burn as shown below.  However, this does point to a weakness in the model employed.









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Characterizing 38mm PVC motors

A previous article described fabricating PVC motors using couplings and endcaps to secure the bulkheads.    Figure 1:  PVC fitting used to retain grains in 2" diameter PVC motor with cork liner.   In an effort to make the motors more flyable, the motors have been redesigned without those elements.   First attempts consisted of drilling a series of 4-6 radial holes and casting the rockite into the holes. This provide insufficient to retain the bulkheads in 4/6 tests, and none of the successful tests exceeded 150 psi.  Figure 2:  Note the forward bulkhead and nozzle bulkheads are extruded out from the pvc.  The next attempt was to cut a 0.25" section 1 1/4" PVC pipe, slit it and glue it into the end of the 1 1/2" pipe.  The Rockite was cast with this lip retaining it.  This was successful in 1/4 tests, but the successful test did hold 380 psi, and the other tests failed at above 300psi.    Here is the data from the...
7 comments
Read more

Low pressure temperature performance of KNSb propellant

Tests were performed on the temperature effect on burn rate for KNSb as follows: Four grains were prepared as follows: 3" Diameter grain 5.5" long  1" Core 3.5" Diameter casting tube  1040 grams propellant +- 50 grams Humidity controlled to < 10% The grains were placed into a low pressure test motor .85" nozzle throat - .02" 98mm phenolic liner KN 65  Single Grain motor from Rick Maschek Notes: Four tests were performed with one failing due to an improperly seated snap ring.    Force data was measured directly and the pressure was obtained basd on the nozzle throat and Cf value for the motor. Test 1: Grain Temperature 55oF +- 5      Data: Peak Pressure 6.7 PSI +-7 Average Pressure 5.5 PSI +- 6 Peak Force 5 lbs +- 3 Average Force  4 +- 2  Burn Time: 18.3s +-  1.8s  Note:  The low pressure of this burn makes it difficult to estimate burn time.  The original estimate was on the order of 16 seconds.   Test 2:...
Post a Comment
Read more

New website to track projects

For over a decade profmason.com was a repository of over 200 electronics and robotics projects that I completed between 2004-2014.  In 2016, my web provider disappeared along with all access to the website.  After spending 2 years and 9 months trying to get the domain back from the Panamanian domain squatter who had bulk purchased my domain when it came up at the registry, I have decided to start a new blog to document my projects new and old. 
2 comments
Read more