Skip to main content

Testing ANCP motors

A total of 5 ANCP motors were produced and tested.  A full test video is available here:  


These are all conventional Ammonium Nitrate composite propellants that use Magnesium to increase temperature and HTPB as a binder.  

The 5 motors manufactured are as follows:
  • Motor 1:  250 PSI regressive (5.5 s burn time)
  • Motor 2: 350 PSI regressive (5.0 s burn time)
  • Motor 3: 350 PSI progressive (4.5 s burn time)
  • Motor 4: 400 PSI regressive (4.5 s burn time)
  • Motor 5: 400 PSI progressive (4s burn time)

The chart show below shows safety factors for PVC motors (at 70 degrees F) with Pressure shown vertically and burn time shown horizontally.  There is  low overall confidence in this model. The case failure as a function of pressure based on the tensile strength of the PVC is well understood, but PVC changes strength rapidly with temperature.  As the burn time increases, there is heat transported to the PVC case which causes its strength to drop rapidly.  An exponential model of heat transport into the PVC has been implemented, but again there is low confidence in the results. The following table is presented as only a first take on appropriate pressures and burn times for 2" PVC motors. 


Looking at the motors tested compared to predictions gives the following results:

  • Motor 1:  Actual pressure 205 PSI burn time 5.5 s  Safety factor 1.77 Success
  • Motor 2: Actual pressure 360 PSI burn time 5 s Safety factor 1.25 Failure
  • Motor 3:  Actual pressure 352 PSI burn time 4.5 s Safety factor 1.39 Success
  • Motor 4: Actual pressure 410 PSI burn time 4.5 s Safety factor 1.09 Failure
  • Motor 5: Actual pressure 402 PSI burn time 4 s Safety factor 1.21 Success

In the next post, there will be detailed analysis of motor 3. 

Comments

  1. After reading the above posts, I got some useful knowledge which is really informative. Thanks for posting it. Test and tagging 

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Characterizing 38mm PVC motors

A previous article described fabricating PVC motors using couplings and endcaps to secure the bulkheads.    Figure 1:  PVC fitting used to retain grains in 2" diameter PVC motor with cork liner.   In an effort to make the motors more flyable, the motors have been redesigned without those elements.   First attempts consisted of drilling a series of 4-6 radial holes and casting the rockite into the holes. This provide insufficient to retain the bulkheads in 4/6 tests, and none of the successful tests exceeded 150 psi.  Figure 2:  Note the forward bulkhead and nozzle bulkheads are extruded out from the pvc.  The next attempt was to cut a 0.25" section 1 1/4" PVC pipe, slit it and glue it into the end of the 1 1/2" pipe.  The Rockite was cast with this lip retaining it.  This was successful in 1/4 tests, but the successful test did hold 380 psi, and the other tests failed at above 300psi.    Here is the data from the...

Making Nozzles in PVC Pipe fittings from Durhams Rock Hard Water Putty and Graphite plate

A single use rocket nozzle can be made using Water Putty and a graphite plate in a 2" PVC Pipe fitting.  Durhams water putty is a gypsum based putty that exhibits very little shrinkage while drying and is effective as a single use nozzle for motors up to 4" in diameter.  Supplies: 2" PVC Coupling 2" PVC to 3/4" threaded female reducer Water putty 1/4" thick graphite plate ~1"x 1" ( 3/8" ID fender washer can be substituted, but it adds additional complexity) Screwdriver or chopstick for mixing 2 spoons duct tape mixing cup Safety glasses nitrile gloves or equivalent Wear safety glasses and nitrile gloves  Use PVC primer to coat the surface of the reducer and the PVC coupling up to the ridge joint. Use PVC glue to coat the surfaces and then press the PVC reducer into the coupling.  Hold for at least 20 seconds so that the reducer doesn't float out of the coupling.  Cover the small hole in the bottom with duct tape to retain the putty, it i...

New website to track projects

For over a decade profmason.com was a repository of over 200 electronics and robotics projects that I completed between 2004-2014.  In 2016, my web provider disappeared along with all access to the website.  After spending 2 years and 9 months trying to get the domain back from the Panamanian domain squatter who had bulk purchased my domain when it came up at the registry, I have decided to start a new blog to document my projects new and old.